Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:33
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What would you do if you found out that someone had broken into your home while you were sleeping?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
AMD Stock Soars as Piper Sandler Raises Price Target After 'Advancing AI' Event - Investopedia
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why cant I ever fall asleep with my boyfriend?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
New COVID-19 variant detected in Washington state. Here’s what to know - The Seattle Times
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Childhood leukemia: how a deadly cancer became treatable - Our World in Data
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How do you deal with a neighbor stealing?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The Fastest Speed That Humans Have Traveled Is 39,937.7 Kilometers Per Hour - IFLScience
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.